Brussels Commentary
Employment Committee Sept 25th/26th
2013
Two days dominated by voting on
Wednesday, following debates on Tuesday.
These included ,”Implementing Council
Directive...equal treatment in employment and occupation”.
Remarkably this failed but only because of a disagreement. Any report
is written by the rapporteur with cooperation from “shadow
rapporteurs”. These are from political groups other than that of
the main rapporteur. In this case the Socialists announced that they
were withdrawing their support for this report because they claimed a
lack of transparency and that the rapporteur had gone back on a
previous agreement. It will now go to the Commission to be written,
not a good idea.
However, this illustrates how this
place works. Deals are done behind closed doors to ensure that
reports go through, entailing “horse trading”. In this case the
negotiations fell though. The actual value of the report does not
seem to matter too much.
“Rule 81 of Parliament’s rules of
Procedure on Consent Practices” was adopted, so now the EC is to be
allowed to alter the terms of any report.
“Reindustrialisation of Europe to
promote competitiveness...” was adopted by 33 -3. Fine ? It will
cost 30 billion Euros for reconstruction. Who will find a large wedge
of that?
To go with the previous item there
was,”Towards a strong... European Car Industry”. Adopted by 34
-3, with no estimate of costs.
Then came,” Conditions of entry of
third country nationals for research, pupil exchange, training (paid
and unpaid) voluntary service and au pairing”. Adopted by 30 – 8
votes, leading to a two tier immigration policy, with the UK
government powerless. (Third country means non-EU).
“National Roma Inclusion Strategies”,
was adopted by 33 – 3, For future impact, but note the term,
“Inclusion”.
Last item was a debate on an,
“Integrated parcel delivery market....growth of e-commerce in the
EU” . So having wrecked our Royal Mail system they will now work on
commercial delivery firms. Apparently they have problems with cross
border deliveries so now they think only of rules imposed from above.
No chance of letting these firms sort it out themselves!
Now the parcel delivery report is being
written by a socialist, Jutta Steinruck. She is also doing,
“Effective labour inspections...improve working conditions, clamp
down on illegals”. Like you I can see the outcome, -a mass of rules
and regs, yet more Red Tape.
In a previous commentary I mentioned I
had been subjected to a “Blue Card” question after speaking in
the House. This was to ask me, “What was Red Tape?”. The
questioner was none other than Ms Steinruck and here she is,
proposing yet more of it!
By the way. All of the “No” vote
figures quoted above includes me in every case.
Derek Clark MEP Brussels 26th
Sept 2013